- Seemingly juvenile words, such as "stuff", seen in multiple subtitles.
- Paragraphs that were way too wordy, it didn't exactly keep me interested for very long.
- There were many places where the author would put and asterisk and then explain at the bottom of the page, but isn't there some way he could have given a simple explanation within the text instead of constantly making us look up and down for tediously long and over thought explanations.
- Making me feel like I'm reading a story instead of a study, narrating every single irrelevant detail that happened to him.
The article was very factual, explaining how people always thought that the left brain was more dominant but really, that isn't true. But is there any way the author could have made this more interesting? More exciting use of words, not necessarily shorter, but less repetition, and things such as that.
The author spent a little too much time narrating his adventures in the fMRI than he did explaining his point about the brain, I think he got a little off topic here and there.
I completely agree with the author's help in proving that people are not exclusively right or left brained, but in the way of quality I was expecting a bit more. I may have found it more interesting if the author had done things a bit differently with this piece.
No comments:
Post a Comment